======
Mark,
We're certainly interested. Would you be willing to work editorially
with me at all on a version for transom.org?
-Jay
======
Jay,
I'd like to work with you on Jail Mail. I'd also love to talk with
you at some point about what direction you think you want to take it,
and whether broadcast on transom.org precludes me from pitching the
story to other programs.
Mark
======
Mark, mainly I'm interested in discussing the use of music, its
advantages and disadvantages, and if we determine that music is the
way to go, whether the music you chose serves the material best.
I liked the material a lot, but sometimes felt lost in time, and
found the boundaries BETWEEN letters to be a bit vague. Do you have
a transcript of the piece? I would not anticipate wanting major
changes, but might want to suggest some edits.
I'm not crazy about the title. It seems a little flip, less
substantive than the piece itself. (Indeed, that was part of my
problem with the music too...and that it seem to direct the emotions
too obviously.)
We'd need to get permissions from the writer, and also some
background on her (photo, etc.) for the site. I'd hope she'd be
interested in getting this material to a wide audience. It carries a
strong message.
Transom.org certainly does NOT prevent you from pitching to other
programs--in fact we URGE you too and we'll help--but it has to
appear on the Transom FIRST and give a credit to Transom on the air.
After a week on Transom exclusively, you are free to place it
anywhere else. Check our "Acquisition Agreement."
To get going, I think we'd need a copy (DAT or CD) of the piece, plus
a copy of the unmixed readings and a transcript. It'd be nice if we
could put this up next month.
let me know what you think... We can talk soon, if this sounds
generally agreeable.
-Jay
======
Please do what you will. And let me know how I can help. And I'm
working on some pics and Carries permission, which I feel sure is a
given. Did the CD arrive?
-Mark
========
yes! thank you. We're just going to jump in and make a first
editorial pass with our suggestions for your reaction. Response here
has been that the material and reading are solid, but that the intro
sets up the wrong expectation and the music continues that
expectation. The piece feels much quieter and simpler to us, but we
will seek your judgement before we go forward. We can always link to
the original piece too, as comparison may be interesting and the
transom site is about process, after all.
-Jay
=======
This sounds great. And I think all of the comments you make
are right on the dot. I will be very honest about my use of
music. I want to evoke strong
emotion in the people who listen to these types of pieces
and I think well-chosen music can take the content further, even
very strong content, further than it can go on its own.
Ira always tells me 'use music like basil...
sprinkle on lots and lots.' Maybe I over-spiced in this instance.
Call me sentimental, but after bumping a long for
ten years in lots and lots of hard news, I want to make some
touching, emotionally meaningful radio. Having said that,I work very,
very hard not to become
emotionally attached to my work so that I'm as subjective
as possible during the editing process... having said THAT I can also
say that I'm almost always dissatisfied with my stuff, and crave really
good edits.
Looking forward to talking.
Regards,
mark
===============
Re. Music as basil....
Ira and I disagree on this. He has made a stylistic choice, and in a
way it's a "branded" choice for his program, to use non-organic
production music to create mood... note I say MOOD, not EMOTION. He
and the TAL team are *masters* of the technique, and it's not as
simple as it sounds. In fact, they've done it so well, it's almost a
cliche. It's the first choice you'd make if you doing a parody of
their show.
Now, when I hear a producer trying to create MOOD in a documentary
with music, I think: "This American Life." (Curse them, they've
ruined it for all of us!)
When I hear a producer trying to manipulate my EMOTIONS in a
documentary through music, I rebel. I don't like being told by music
what to feel. (there are exceptions... like dramatic material within
a documentary, etc.... and lord knows, sometimes you're just not able
to resist.) On the other hand, I often don't mind if music is
leading me through a story in an organic, integral way if it's
motivated, i.e. music that has a CONNECTION to the story or serves a
structural function.
I think musical chapter breaks (from letter to letter) might be
justifiable in this piece, but underlaid mood music is not, because
it gets in her face.
Let me rationalize another way. If Carrie had created this piece
directly for radio, if she had a hand in picking the music, I'd feel
differently. But these are letters. They existed before the radio
piece. She's reading them. It's the PRODUCER'S choice, not hers, to
embellish her words. I find that intrusive.
The other option is to use music that she actually REFERS TO in her
writing. Did she ever do that? That could provide an organic
motivation.
I think these letters are strong enough to stand on their own. They
don't need basil. As good as it is, Basil isn't always good on
everything.
But, hey, it's a matter of taste.
thanks and I'm looking forward to this. I hope the editorial
comments are useful and I appreciate your openness and enthusiasm.
--Jay